Notes
Slide Show
Outline
1
 
2
Plural verbs in Africa
  • Plural verbs occur throughout most of Africa and have certainly been recorded in Niger-Congo, Afroasiatic  and Nilo-Saharan language phyla
  • Nonetheless, their distribution is very patchy which may be related to broadly to the incidence of verb morphology; where verbs have derivational morphology, plural verbs can occur.
  • Branches of phyla which have lost morphology, such as West Benue-Congo, can only develop plural verbs through suppletion, which does occur, but is very rare
  • This talk will cover languages where verbal plurals have been lexicalised; languages with productive extensions marking frequentative or iterative, such as Bantu are not considered
  • As a consequence most attention is give to morphology but examples of syntax are found in the source papers


3
Plural verbs in Central Nigeria
  • Central Nigeria is a sort of ‘heartland’ for systems of plural verbs; all languages have them and they are very different from one language to another
  • This is in part because a number of language families with residual systems have come into intensive contact and influenced and reinforced each other’s systems Central Nigeria is a region where morphologically marked plural verbs are extremely common, although the linguistic literature yields few descriptions. Strikingly, plural verbs strategies cross boundaries of both language families and phyla. The uses of plural verbs can be categorised as follows;
    • 1. Describing an action repeated many times (iterative)
    • 2. Describing an action with multiple subjects (distributive)
    • 3. Describing an action with multiple objects (distributive)
    • 4. Describing an action conducted over a long time (durative) (sometimes merging with imperfective)
    • 5. Describing the intensity of an action
  • Any combination of these
4
How do you subclassify types of plurality?
  • The literature is full of different terms to describe these verbs and sophisticated distinctions between plural and pluractional etc.
  • At least for many languages dealt with here, this is to make the impoverished descriptive literature carry more weight than it can bear
  • Unless you actually test each verb individually with a range of informants  it is simply not possible to assert the range of application of individual verbs
5
Languages of Central Nigeria
  • The languages of Central Nigeria fall into two major phyla, Afroasiatic and Niger-Congo
  • Afroasiatic is represented by West Chadic languages, of which the most well-known is Hausa, and the Benue-Congo languages, most characteristically Plateau and East Kainji
  • Further east are the Adamawa languages which have also show verbal plurality and to the south, Nupoid, for which plurality is reported for Gbari but not elsewhere in the family
  • We know that these families have undergone extensive interaction in the past and although they are likely to have inherited the concept of plurality from earlier stages of the phylum, there is no doubt that the synchronic forms are the result of direct and indirect borrowing
6
Languages of Central Nigeria
7
Materials presented here
  • The materials presented here are extracted from a series of datasets of varying completeness on languages of Central Nigeria all of which are available for download from my website They present data samples from a range of languages, focusing of particular aspects of morphology
  • A failure to realise the significance of plural verbs often means that verbal plurality is not recognised in grammatical descriptions and not clearly listed in dictionary-type materials
  • Unlike nouns, verb pairings (or more) are not quickly available to informants. Therefore we cannot be sure that we have complete lists for any given language
  • Suppletion is fairly common, and therefore whether a quite different root is the ‘plural’ of a singular can be disputed. This probably relates to semantic ramification common with some types of verbs such as ‘cut’ or ‘pour’.
8
Threatened morphology
  • Pluractional forms are threatened in many languages; i.e. younger informants do not know them or only know them passively
  • The reasons are disputed; is it part of general trend towards simplification of morphology among increasingly urbanised youth?
  • Or is it that ‘you don’t speak the language properly until you are xx years old’?
  • Perversely, semantic shifts and suppletive plurals are probably conserved better than those with predictable meanings (clearly you can speak and be understood without using them)
  • But it seems likely much of the data recorded here will not be recoverable in a couple of decades although the languages will still be spoken
9
Background to Mwaghavul
    • Mwaghavul is a West Chadic language formerly known as Sura
    • Its closest relatives are Ngas, Goemai etc.
    • It is spoken in Plateau State, Nigeria. The major towns are Mangu and Panyam
    • There are probably ca. 200,000 speakers
    • Part of its system of verbal plurality is inherited from Afroasiatic; the ‘internal –a- plural’ which occurs in both nouns and verbs and is attested in various branches of AA
    •  The second element is plurality
    •  The third is borrowing (apparently of morphemes) from neighbouring Benue-Congo languages


10
Mwaghavul inherited internal plural formation
11
Mwaghavul suppletive plural formation
12
Mwaghavul borrowed plural formation
13
εBoze background
  • εBoze is an East Kainji language spoken some 10 km northwest of Jos. There are probably 10,000 speakers some of limited competence
  • East Kainji languages are some of the most poorly known languages in Nigeria. There are probably ca. 20, although they are all quite closely related (we think)
  •  The West Kainji languages have complex plural verb morphology, but the present evidence is that East Kainji affixes are reduced
  •  Moreover, there is less evidence for borrowing from neighbouring languages than the other groups discussed here.
  • This may be  consequence of poorer coverage
14
εBoze plural verb morphology I
  • εBoze verbs  plural extensions typically refer to;
        • Plural subjects
        • Plural objects
        • Iteratives
  • Ca. 50% of εBoze verbs appear to have these extensions, although the existence of an extension appears to be unpredictable. They are not well-known and it often takes time to recall them during elicitation
15
εBoze plural verb morphology II
  • Broadly speaking, in transitive verbs the plural extension refers to multiple objects and with intransitives to plural subjects
  • The use of iteratives is not predictable
  • Singular/plural stems are always cognate, there are no suppletive plurals presently recorded, although these occur in Plateau languages
16
εBoze plural verb morphology III
17
εBoze plural verb morphology IV
18
εBoze plural verb morphology V
  • All of these appear to derive from an original affix, either ZYV- or -SV where ZY is a palatal affricate and S is an unspecified fricative and the V is either –a/ə or copies the stem.
  • The suffix -SV can either follow the stem, or replace the final –CV syllable.
  • The most unpredictable element is the vowel of the affix unless the stem vowel is  -a-
  • These pluralising elements occur in other areas of the lexicon, notably ideophones


19
Background to Berom
    • Eastern Berom is a Plateau language spoken North of Jos in central Nigeria
    •  There may be up to a million speakers, but Berom is quite dialectally diverse and not all the forms discussed here occur in other dialects
    • Berom has a very large number of plural verbs with many different subtypes and categories
    • The surface pairings that occur today are to be explained by the addition, erosion and re-affixing of fossil verbal extensions which have been semantically bleached so that they now only indicate plurality.
    • No case exists synchronically of verbs where the productive application of more than one affix is permitted.
20
Surface processes in Berom plural verb morphology
21
Berom-Izere verb cognates with comparable morphology
22
Berom three-way systems
23
Is this somehow linked to three-way systems of nominal classification?
    • Although Niger-Congo nouns usually show two-way oppositions for number (alternations of CV affixes) there are persistent traces of three term systems as found widely in Nilo-Saharan
    •  Thus;
      • A beer beer beers
      • Ear of grain cereal head field of cereal plants
    • The central term is the unmarked form
    • This idea seems to be somehow similar to verbs, both in Berom and in Vagla (a Gur language)
24
Izere nominalisation of plural verbs
25
Izere nominalisation of plural verbs
26
Fyem: an incipient ‘system’ of plural verbs?
    • The Fyem language appears to have an incipient system of plural verbs being regularised. There are morphologically marked distinctions between number of subjects and event numbers
    • The unmarked form appears to a single subject performing a single action.
    • Some verbs distinguish;
      • Plural subjects
      • Single subject and multiple actions
      • Plural subjects and plural actions
    • Data testing remains woefully incomplete
27
Some Fyem paradigms
28
Concluding
    • Central Nigeria is an area of great diversity and remains largely undescribed but which undoubtedly results from interaction og languages though marriage systems and extensive bilingualism
    • There do appear to be any obvious semantic drivers motivating the choice of verbs to have/retain plural morphology
    • Evidence for direct lexical borrowing is quite limited, despite the Berom-Izere example. In most cases it is more the idea of plurality and sometimes the morphemes
    • Generalisations about what plural verbs ‘do’ are doomed to failure due to the multiplex and diverse systems
    • This research also has practical consequences' for written materials. Do you represent conservative speech given the predominant audience for literacy are the younger generation?
    • Much analysed and raw data can be downloaded from my website…
29
THANKS
    • To Kay Williamson Educational Foundation for supporting the fieldwork and my presence here
    • To the various communities and individuals who have helped compile the relevant datasets